South Korea Report Calls for Stablecoin Rules Before Crypto Law
CMC Crypto News

South Korea Report Calls for Stablecoin Rules Before Crypto Law

A policy report from Hashed Open Research and the Solana Policy Institute urges South Korea to phase in stablecoin rules before its Digital Asset Basic Act is passed.

South Korea Report Calls for Stablecoin Rules Before Crypto Law

Table of Contents

South Korea's stablecoin regulatory debate is drawing attention ahead of the country's broader crypto legislation, with a new policy report urging authorities to act on stablecoins before a comprehensive framework is in place.

The report, published July 29 by Hashed Open Research and the Solana Policy Institute, summarizes a June 23 symposium that brought together lawmakers, legal experts, and industry participants to discuss the country's approach to digital asset regulation.

A Law Still Waiting To Be Finished

South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act would be the country's first comprehensive digital asset framework, covering stablecoin issuance, disclosures, and market rules. Lawmakers have not yet reconciled several competing bills, and disagreements over stablecoin issuance rules have held up the legislation.

Democratic Party lawmaker Ahn Dogeol said policymakers were weighing a compromise that would allow banks to retain majority ownership of stablecoin operations while fintech and non-bank firms handled day-to-day management.

Related Article: South Korea Plans New Law To Manage Crypto as State Assets

What the Report Recommends

Kim Hyobong, a partner at law firm Bae, Kim & Lee, said South Korea should clarify which crypto activities financial institutions are permitted to conduct, resolve licensing uncertainty around stablecoin payments, and establish rules for foreign-issued stablecoins operating in the country.

Kim also pointed to the EU's phased rollout of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation as a model, arguing South Korea should introduce stablecoin issuance rules in advance of the Digital Asset Basic Act rather than waiting for the full law to pass. The report echoes that position, recommending licensing guidance and greater regulatory flexibility for stablecoin issuers in the interim.

This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
0 people liked this article